<aside>
馃搯 Important dates
Submission: 30/01/2022 06/02/2022
Notification of acceptance: 18/02/2022
Camera ready submission: 25/02/2022
Workshop:07/03/2022
</aside>
This workshop aims to gather researchers from Human-Robot Interaction and Human-Computer Interaction fields, Design Research and any other discipline relevant to HRI, interested in learning more about the conceptually generative power of design and Annotated Portfolios methodology. We will explore how novel robotic artefacts can challenge the norm of HRI design practices.
We invite authors to submit a pictorial (2-5 pages including references) using the workshop templates below, and submit via email at: [email protected]
The pictorial should articulate the author(s) critical perspective about one or more robotic artefacts of their choice. Relevant artefacts can vary from commercial robots to HRI research prototypes. We particularly welcome discussions and commentaries of robotic artefacts articulated in highly visual forms, as well as conceptual and theoretical discussions of artefact typologies and exemplaries through more traditional text formats, as position papers.
Relevant topics include but are not limited to: 路 聽 HRI and interaction design 路 聽 Design and prototyping of robotic artefacts 路 聽 Robot aesthetics 路 聽 Interaction design critique 路 聽 HRI strong concepts 路 聽 HRI design patterns 路 聽 HRI design norms
To have a better sense of what a pictorial is and how the visual format could be used, have a look at the examples below.
Designing an embodied conversational agent for a learning space
Useful Uselessness? | Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
Collection of Metaphors for Human-Robot Interaction
<aside> 馃摉 Lupetti, Zaga, & Cila. Designerly ways of knowing in HRI: Broadening the scope of design-oriented HRI through the concept of intermediate-level knowledge. HRI'21 https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444668
</aside>
<aside> 馃摉 Luria, Hoggenmu虉ller, Lee, Hespanhol, Jung, & Forlizzi. Research through Design Approaches in Human-Robot Interaction. HRI'21 https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3444868
</aside>
<aside> 馃摉 Hoggenmu虉ller, Lee, Hespanhol, Jung. and Tomitsch. Eliciting New Perspectives in RtD Studies through Annotated Portfolios: A Case Study of Robotic Artefacts. DIS'21 https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462134
</aside>
<aside> 馃摉 Cila, Zaga, & Lupetti. Learning from robotic artefacts: A quest for strong concepts in Human-Robot Interaction. DIS'21 https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462095
</aside>
<aside> 馃摉 L枚wgren. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge. Interactions, 20(1), 2013, https://doi.org/10.1145/2405716.2405725
</aside>
<aside> 馃摉 Zamfirescu-Pereira, Sirkin, Goedicke, Friedman, Mandel, and Ju. Fake it to make it: Exploratory prototyping in HRI. HRI'21 https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3446909
</aside>
<aside> 馃摉 Gaver, & Bowers. Annotated portfolios. Interactions, 19(4), 2012 https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212889
</aside>
<aside> 馃摉 Cul茅n, B酶rsting, and Gaver. Strategies for Annotating Portfolios: Mapping Designs for New Domains. DIS'20 https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395490
</aside>